Somebody who when you’re in trouble you can call and say come and they wouldn’t say well do this and I’ll see you in the morning. They would just show up. And I think children need that too. They need to know who they can go to. That you’re going to be there. That you’ll get up no matter how tired you are. I hope that my children always know that. We also need people who are confidents. People that we can say something to and we know they would never repeat it.
Things to think about
How many people in your life give you any kind of support? Is it one person, a handful, or several depending on your needs?
Do you let kids confide in you?
What kind of support person are you in others life?
What kind of support person are you to children?
Highlights from Playful Wisdom
by Michael Mendizza featuring Bev Bos and Joseph Chilton Pearce
Jerry Mander, author of The Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television, with the deepest insights about TV and media in general, noted way back in 1970’s that media has a very difficult time representing the sacred or love. When pressed through the technology-sieve, the sacred ends up looking hokey. But media has an easy time representing fear and violence; that it not only does well but with compound interest. In this way commercial media-advertising-technology is essentially Machiavellian, using clever lies and tricks in order to get or achieve something—clever and dishonest by design. Those who control media-technology know this, which was the overarching theme of Jerry’s book. And these toxic, for-profit, commercial image-making photons are shot directly into the brains of billions of unsuspecting human beings, who predictably react as Pavlovian dogs when the bell rings. Because of this, media-based technology is the handmaiden of the lowest flight-fight brain. Fox-Not-News is one of the most blatant examples. Where that is “the other,” love and compassion are not. It is that simple.
A brain completely enchanted by fear is incapable of perceiving anything else. Even when projecting safety, it is in response to fear and therefore is fear in disguise. Our only hope, and this is a big stretch, is to allow our young and precious developing hearts and minds to experience safety, play, and therefore love deeply enough, long enough, so that when fear does pop out of the box, it is seen for what it is, a hoax, and is transformed by the light of insight. Developing this sensitivity, awareness and transformative insight is the challenge and responsibility we call parenting. But first things first. We must be the change we hope for our children. We must see the hoax and transform our fear into love, and become what Joseph Chilton Pearce calls the “model imperative.” Nothing less will meet the challenge. With this imperative in mind, it is important to distinguish between a “real” experience and a concept or idea. Unless our ideas, study and insights are translated into “actual behavior,” they remain thin and superficial, almost nonexistent. And this includes the thousands of hours we spend relating to computers, tablets, phones, in school, and on the Internet. It is not the thought that counts. It is how we treat each other; love or fear.