And here is why.

If Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is on the ballot next November, he will win the presidential election by a greater majority than any candidate in recent history.

Consequences of Government Weaponization - Apparent RFKjr Assassination Attempt: A Requiem for Civil Society

Robert W. Malone, MD, MS

Many mainstream media outlets have (intentionally or accidentally) provided misinformation about RFK Jr’s request for Secret Service protection. The erroneous information provided to the public most often is that Secret Service protection is only provided 120 days before the election, and that thus, RFK Jr’s request was too early. That is not true.

When it comes to misinformation, CNN led the pack in their “Fact check” article titled “RFK’s misleading viral claim about Secret Service protection”

They claim Kennedy “baselessly” suggested the Biden Administration was “singling him out for rare treatment,” and said that Kennedy’s statement about the denial of protection was “highly misleading.”

Ironically, CNN then misleads its readers by stating: “Kennedy’s suggestion that he is being treated differently than every other presidential candidate since 1968 is baseless.”

Scanning the references below that CNN chose to ignore, you decide if RFK Jr is being treated differently than past presidential candidates.

• 1968 election: Just days after Senator Robert Kennedy was assassinated at a campaign event, the sitting Administration provided Secret Service protection to five candidates, and by the end of the 1968 campaign, twelve candidates were protected by USSS.
• 1980 election: The Carter Administration provided early Secret Service protection to rivals Ronald Reagan, John B. Connally, George Bush, Illinois Representative Philip M. Crane, and Tennessee Representative Howard H. Baker, 663 days before the election.  The Carter Administration provided early Secret Service protection for Senator Edward M. Kennedy 441 days prior to the election – before Kennedy even announced his candidacy. The Washington Post reported; at the time that Kennedy’s “consideration of a presidential campaign has raised the fear of an assassination attempt such as those that struck down two of his brothers.”

Note: Ted Kennedy had also been provided Secret Service protection twice before: In 1968 after his brother Robert was assassinated while campaigning for the Democratic presidential nomination, and again in 1972 after the shooting of Alabama Governor George C. Wallace at a campaign event – when he wasn’t even running for President.

• 1984 election: The Reagan Administration provided early Secret Service protection for Jesse Jackson 362 days before Election Day, and offered early Secret Service protection to rivals Walter Mondale, John Glenn, Florida Governor Reubin Askew, Senator Gary Hart, Senator Ernest Hollings, and former Senator George McGovern, all 297 days before the election.
• 1988 election: The Reagan Administration provided early Secret Service protection for Pat Robertson 343 days before the election, for Jesse Jackson 351 days before the election, and for Governor Michael Dukakis soon after.
• 1992 election: The Bush Administration provided early Secret Service protection for rival Bill Clinton 249 days before the election.
• 1996 election: The Clinton Administration approved early Secret Service protection for rivals Pat Buchanan, 251 days before the election, and Bob Dole 219 days before the election.
• 2000 election: The Clinton Administration afforded early Secret Service protection to George W. Bush, 221 days before the election.
• 2004 election: The Bush Administration afforded early Secret Service protection to John Kerry, 256 days before the election, and the same for John Edwards soon after.
• 2008 election: The Bush Administration provided early Secret Service protection for Barrack Obama, 551 days before the election, despite not meeting the polling criteria (that RFK Jr has met), and despite not having “any specific, credible threat” against him (unlike RFK Jr).  The Bush Administration also provided early Secret Service protection for rival John McCain, 195 days before the election.
• 2012 election: The Obama Administration provided early Secret Service protection for rivals Herman Cain (355 days before the election), Newt Gingrich (245 days before the election), Mitt Romney (279 days) Rick Santorum (254 days).
• 2016 election: The Obama Administration approved early Secret Service protection for Donald Trump and Ben Carson, 369 days before the 2016 election, and for Bernie Sanders, 279 days before the election.
• 2020 election: The Trump Administration approved early Secret Service protection for rival Joe Biden 231 days before the election.

Among all these past administrations going back to the Johnson Administration in 1968, only the Biden Administration has ever denied a formal protection request (now two formal requests) from a presidential candidate.

I mourn how far the standards of civil American society have fallen.

Which brings us to this moment in time, when a credible threat to Mr. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has manifested. An entirely predictable, anticipated threat. A threat for which Secret Service protection has been specifically rejected by the administration of Mr. Kennedy’s political opponent, President Biden, based on technical grounds.

And here is why.

If Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is on the ballot next November, he will win the presidential election by a greater majority than any candidate in recent history.

From “The Struggle for Democracy,” by David Marks, writer, investigative reporter, documentary producer and director. Highlights.

The Democratic National Committee’s changing of rules including the date of the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary are solely designed to rig voting and influence the image of President Biden. This chicanery is matched by the Trump campaign’s attempt to dominate the Republican Party’s nomination apparatus.

The deterioration and division caused by the two-party system are not hidden. The United States is being torn apart by partisan agendas that have little to do with the daily lives of its citizens.

Beneath the manipulations, slogans, and propaganda — different facts are revealed.

An nEconomist/YouGov poll provided a stunning revelation about the favorability of presidential contenders and who would likely become president if the electoral process was not encumbered by a divisive process. Among all Americans, regardless of party affiliation, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has the highest ratings above every candidate — surpassing both Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

A subsequent Harvard-Harris poll of registered US voters on the Favorability of Political Figures confirmed similar profound results.

A few news articles reported these meaningful findings, although both surveys have been virtually ignored. Mr. Kennedy’s name was not included in a later Gallup poll of popular newsmakers, confirming a disinterest in acknowledging the preferred candidate of the majority of Americans.

Coverage of the surveys simply twisted words, exposing a desperate attempt by mainstream news to blur the truth. In a bizarre story, Newsweek magazine announced that Robert Kennedy Jr. Would Be Winning 2024 if it Was a Popularity Contest. In an effort to deflect the importance of the data, the article diminishes the relevance of its headline and attempts to reduce the viability of the Kennedy campaign.

The sum of what a candidate presents to the public, including personality and platform, determines the ultimate elements of their popularity. The Economist and Harvard polls present a reality that won’t be disguised or repressed. The numbers clearly indicate a preference for Mr. Kennedy’s leadership; reinforcing the fact that the current electoral process is engineered to betray the will of the people.

The powerful leaders of both parties know that their presidential candidate will pretend to be many things, but any transgression from corporate favoritism is unacceptable.

Despite the country’s majority of voters having a preference for Mr. Kennedy’s leadership, so far he has declined to run as an independent, recognizing this could inflame the adversarial atmosphere. His ultimate goal is healing the divide, he said, “My aim is to convince every Democrat that you’re not a Democrat and every Republican that you’re not a Republican.”

This quote and concept are not found in any news coverage because it violates an essential code that allows continuing partisan corruption. Instead, Mr. Kennedy is insulted and berated because of his threat to the kleptocracy that dominates the country.

Divisive politics serves only one purpose: while Democrats and Republicans insult each other and brawl, the wealthiest and most powerful Americans profit from the battle.

Mr. Kennedy’s strong popularity is very worrying to those who have struggled to maintain illicit and treacherous power. This explains the relentless efforts to diminish his prominence.